<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Numbers on Aurélien&#39;s Math Notebook</title>
    <link>https://math.aurelienooms.be/tags/numbers/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Numbers on Aurélien&#39;s Math Notebook</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://math.aurelienooms.be/tags/numbers/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Infinite Number of Primes</title>
      <link>https://math.aurelienooms.be/2017/07/22/infinite-number-of-primes/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://math.aurelienooms.be/2017/07/22/infinite-number-of-primes/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The erroneous proof I hear most often is: Suppose \(P\) is a
finite set that contains all the primes, then \(p^* = 1 + \prod_{p \in P} p\) is
prime. Indeed, the flaw is that \(p^*\) is not necessarily prime but rather
must be a multiple of some prime not in \(P\).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Symbols</title>
      <link>https://math.aurelienooms.be/2015/11/08/symbols/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://math.aurelienooms.be/2015/11/08/symbols/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;$$
\mathbb{N} \subset \mathbb{Z} \subset \mathbb{Q} \subset \mathbb{R} \subset \mathbb{C}
$$&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Fibonacci numbers</title>
      <link>https://math.aurelienooms.be/2015/06/29/fibonacci/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://math.aurelienooms.be/2015/06/29/fibonacci/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Fibonacci numbers are defined as \(f_0 = 0,\ f_1 = 1\) and, for \(i \ge
2,\ f_i = f_{i-1} + f_{i-2}\). Here is the beginning of the Fibonacci sequence:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;\(0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, \ldots\)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We generalize the definition above by changing the two initial values, for
example with \(f_0 = 4,\ f_1 = 6\) we obtain&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;\(4, 6, 10, 16, 26, 42, \ldots\)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Complex numbers division</title>
      <link>https://math.aurelienooms.be/2015/06/23/complex-division/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://math.aurelienooms.be/2015/06/23/complex-division/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;$$
\frac{a+bi}{c+di} = \ldots
$$&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
